Effect of delay in FIR 157 in trial
https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2010/5049/5049_2010_32_1501_22184_Judgement_26-May-2020.pdf
Posts
Partnershp
https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2009/33609/33609_2009_32_1502_22184_Judgement_26-May-2020.pdf
Withholding of Gratuity Service Matter Important to read Every termination not dismisal
https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2013/30261/30261_2013_33_1501_22275_Judgement_27-May-2020.pdf (i) as to whether is it permissible in law for the appellant (employer) to withhold the payment of gratuity of the respondent (employee), even after his superannuation from service, because of the pendency of the disciplinary proceedings against him?, and (ii) where the departmental enquiry had been instituted against an employee while he was in service and continued after he attained the age of superannuation, whether the punishment of dismissal can beimposed on being found guilty of misconduct in ...
WILL was under Supicious
https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2014/30725/30725_2014_32_1503_22157_Judgement_19-May-2020.pdf
Bank not liable for not purchasing the insurance policy of HP goods
https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/13934/13934_2019_35_1501_22109_Judgement_20-May-2020.pdf
WILL can be proved by Secondary Evidences
https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2017/16482/16482_2017_32_1502_22037_Judgement_13-May-2020.pdf
Interenet and National Security
https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2020/10817/10817_2020_33_1502_22029_Judgement_11-May-2020.pdf
Doctrine of Frustation of contract
https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2008/7009/7009_2008_33_1501_22029_Judgement_11-May-2020.pdf
quia timet action
quia timet action https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2017/17266/17266_2017_32_1504_21962_Judgement_06-May-2020.pdf
Physical Possession of Land by Govt Auth by Panchnama
https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2011/14813/14813_2011_32_1502_21962_Judgement_06-May-2020.pdf Balwant Narayan Bhagde vs. M.D. Bhagwat & Ors.(1976) 1 SCC 700 (paragraph 28) Balmokand Khatri Educational and Industrial Trust vs. State of Punjab (1996) 4 SCC 212 (paragraph 4) and Tamil Nadu Housing Board vs. A. Viswam (Dead) by LRs. (1996) 8 SCC 259 (paragraph 9) regarding the settled legal position that it is difficult to take physical possession of the land under compulsory acquisition. Further, that the normal mode of taking possession is drafting the Panchnama in the presence of Panchas and taking possession and giving delivery to the bene...
Civil Contempt
https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/14361/14361_2019_32_1505_21962_Judgement_06-May-2020.pdf R.N. Dey & Ors. vs. Bhagyabati Pramanik & Ors. (2000) 4 SCC 400 16. At the outset, we must advert to the contours delineated by this court for initiating civil contempt action in Ram Kishan vs. Tarun Bajaj & Ors.(2014) 16 SCC 204 Jhareswar Prasad Paul & Anr. vs. Tarak Nath Ganguly & Ors (2002) 5 SCC 352
Scope of Article 226
https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2017/10293/10293_2017_32_1503_21962_Judgement_06-May-2020.pdf 17. The appellant Bank has rightly invited our attention to the Constitution Bench decision of this Court in Thansingh Nathmal (supra). In paragraph 7, the Court dealt with the scope jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution in the following words: “7. … The jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution is couched in wide terms and the exercise thereof is not subject to any restrictions except the territorial restrictions which are expressly...
